Seven1

 

At the end of 7 Days, the handcuffed protagonist is led away from the scene of his crimes by police.  A reporter asks this disturbed doctor if what he’s done brought him any closure.  “No,” the man says.  Does he regret what he’s done?  “No,” he says again.

Those questions are at the heart of this Canadian drama.  What would you do if your eight-year-old daughter was raped, murdered, dumped in a field – and then you managed to kidnap and confine the perpetrator for a whole week?  It’s a difficult question, and the movie gives us answers not just from Dr. Bruno Hamel (Claude Legault), but also from his wife, from a widowed policeman, and from the parents of several other murdered girls.

Director Daniel Grou lets the audience dwell on that sticky question for 105 minutes, and then, as if that moral quandary weren’t depressing enough, we must watch as Dr. Hamel perverts his medical expertise, torturing his captive in graphic, gory, and ingenious ways.

The problem with 7 Days is that it’s three movies in one:  police thriller, family tragedy … and torture porn.  It’s too slow-paced to be particularly suspenseful, too gruesome for serious contemplation, and hey, if it’s the torture you dig, there are some Japanese movies (not to mention the Hostel franchise) that will better suit your needs.

What we’re left with is an interesting misfire that can best be summed up in two words:  unpleasant and depressing.           Grade:  B-

 

Seven2

 

Director:  Daniel Grou  Cast:  Remy Girard, Claude Legault, Fanny Mallette, Martin Dubreuil, Rose-Marie Coallier, Pascale Delhaes  Release:  2010

 

Seven3                 Seven4

            Watch Trailers  (click here)

 

© 2010-2026 grouchyeditor.com (text only)

Share

VideoFree

 

Think American politicians are corrupt?  Is the average American too glued to the boob-tube, too into junk like reality TV?  It could be worse.  You could live in Italy.  If you don’t believe that, read my review of this 2010 documentary, and then watch it free on Hulu.  (You’ll have to create a Hulu account, but it’s free, it takes 30 seconds, and they don’t spam you.)

 

© 2010-2026 grouchyeditor.com (text only)

Share

OReilly          Aniston

Poop List:  Female Honoree — Jennifer Aniston

 

It takes a lot to get me to side with Bill O’Reilly, but not this week.  Jennifer Aniston, plugging a new movie in which a woman gets pregnant using a sperm donor, shared this bit of wisdom:  “Women are realizing it more and more, knowing that they don’t have to settle with a man just to have that child.”  She went on, “And, of course, many women dream of finding Prince Charming, but for those who’ve not yet found their Bill O’Reilly, I’m just glad science has provided a few other options.”

O’Reilly had said that Aniston’s original comments were “destructive to our society … diminishing the role of the dad.”  He added, “I think men get hosed all day long in the parental arena.”

O’Reilly is correct and Aniston is acting the pampered movie star whose love life isn’t everything she expected.  Imagine if a male celebrity (say, Mel Gibson) suggested that women should just give birth and then turn the kids over to men for child raising.

 

Santana

Poop List:  Male Honoree — Johan Santana

 

Yawn.  Another week, and another jock getting his wrist slapped for alleged sexual assault.  OK, even if the Mets pitcher is innocent of the assault, he still got busted cheating on his wife.

 

Slater

Too Tired to Poop List:  Steven Slater

 

I am already sick of this guy.  You made a grand exit once.  Now do it again, please.

 

*****

 

Worthless Technology

Security cameras      Every time my local news anchor asks me to keep an eye out for some culprit caught on camera, often in a convenience store, the picture looks like this:

 

 

Or this:

 

Camera1

 

These “security” pictures are about as helpful as erectile dysfunction.  Speaking of which …

 

Erect1 Erect2 Erect3

 

How desperate are some men for better nookie?  These are the potential side effects of something called sildenafil:

“Some patients experienced a sudden loss of some or all of their vision … the vision loss was permanent in some cases … there have been reports of heart attack, stroke, irregular heartbeat, bleeding in the brain or lungs, high blood pressure, and sudden death in men who took sildenafil for erectile dysfunction.”

 

Wouldn’t you rather just take a cold shower?

 

© 2010-2026 grouchyeditor.com (text only)

Share

Amelie1

 

From what I can tell, there are two big reasons the French film Amelie has achieved cult status.  I’ll buy into one of those reasons.  As for the other reason … I’m only kinda sorta on board.

Reason One is the star of this whimsical fantasy, Audrey Tautou.  If your taste in acting favors “quirky,” “eccentric,” “Bohemian” and “hippie,” you will be captivated by both the actress and the film.  But this conceit – that Tautou is so enchanting, so similar to that other Audrey – assumes everyone will embrace her waiflike charms.   Tautou is appealing, but I wouldn’t put her in Hepburn’s league.

Amelie (Tautou) is a shy waitress who makes a vow with herself to do good unto others (and, if warranted, bad).  This karma-code introduces Amelie to one oddball Parisian after another.  But this is fantasy land, so even the “bad” people she encounters are not truly evil.  The pornography shop where her true love toils is presented as more neighborhood boutique than den of sin.

You have to buy into this alternate universe for the movie to work.  You must accept that when, at long last, Amelie finds the man of her dreams (Mathieu Kassovitz), he is impossibly nice:  goofy, ineffectual, and apparently sexless – like Amelie herself. In this universe, lovemaking means innocent caresses, and nothing more.  When Amelie takes her man to bed, it’s as if she simply exchanged her childhood goldfish for an adult man.  

Reason Two to enjoy Amelie, the element I did buy into, is a humdinger:  It is a visual feast.  There are references to Renoir in the dialogue, and I have to believe the French artist would be impressed by this film’s look.  Amelie is simply one of the most gorgeous movies I’ve seen.  Every shot is a funhouse palette of greens, reds and golds – the Land of Oz in neon hues.  The film was Oscar-nominated for both art direction and cinematography, and it’s a mystery to me how it did not win.

Amelie is wish-fulfillment for dreamers, and there’s little harm in that.  Not all movies are intended to be realistic.  But if you wish for something more than two hours of quirky, eccentric, and dreamy, you’d best look elsewhere.         Grade:  B

 

Amelie2

 

Director:  Jean-Pierre Jeunet  Cast:  Audrey Tautou, Mathieu Kassovitz, Rufus, Lorella Cravotta, Serge Merlin, Jamel Debbouze, Clotilde Mollet, Yolande Moreau, Isabelle Nanty  Release:  2001

 

Amelie3

Amelie4                Amelie5

       Watch Trailers  (click here)

 

© 2010-2026 grouchyeditor.com (text only)

Share

by Guillermo Martinez

Oxford

 

Martinez’s so-so whodunit suffers a bit from what I’ll call “Carl Sagan Syndrome.”  Sagan, the late, great scientist, took a stab at novel writing with Contact – with decidedly mixed results.  When Sagan’s characters in Contact were expounding on something in the author’s comfort zone (astronomy, physics), the story was fascinating.  But when Sagan turned his attention to romance, well … let’s just say his inner 13-year-old was exposed.  Sagan’s love scenes were as awkward as a young math whiz straining to kiss his first crush.  

Similarly, Martinez, a mathematician, does well when his main character, logician Arthur Seldom, is lecturing on the Pythagoreans or speculating on murder, but other elements of the book suffer.  The secondary characters, the historical setting, and even the mystery are bare-boned.  Still, Seldom as a mathematical Sherlock Holmes, and the youthful narrator as his Watson, do make an entertaining duo.

 

© 2010-2026 grouchyeditor.com (text only)

Share

Jones1

 

Money can’t buy happiness.  There you have it; now you don’t need to watch The Joneses.

There are only so many themes a movie can tackle, so I can’t blame the makers of this David Duchovny-Demi Moore vehicle for adopting a “thou shall not covet” motif, but what you hope for is a fresh spin on an old subject.  Unhappily,  if I had to describe The Joneses in one word, that word would be “flat.”

The movie wants to be a biting satire on shallow consumerism, a paean to old-fashioned values.  Its plot hook must have seemed clever at some point:   A “perfect” family, the Joneses, infiltrates super-rich neighborhoods and proceeds to leverage envy as a means to sell products.  The twist is that this so-called family is bogus — just another product manufactured by corporate America.

But the film falls flat because there are no sympathetic characters.  Duchovny and Moore give it their best shot, but their characters as written are not relatable. Duchovny is robotic and soft, a benevolent ball of smudge.  Moore’s wife/boss, I suppose, represents the fallacy of feminism’s “you can have it all” mentality.   But spare me any modern-woman twaddle about Moore’s character; a bitch is a bitch is a bitch.

Predictably, the fake-family act begins to unravel for the Joneses in the film’s final act, but by then, who cares?  Even Duchovny’s Big Speech to the neighborhood falls flat, and the movie’s ending feels tacked on.  Money might not buy happiness, but it can certainly rent you a better movie than The Joneses      Grade:  C-

 

Jones2

 

Director:  Derrick Borte  Cast:  Demi Moore, David Duchovny, Amber Heard, Ben Hollingsworth, Gary Cole, Glenne Headly, Lauren Hutton  Release:  2009

 

Jones3     Watch Trailers  (click here)

 

© 2010-2026 grouchyeditor.com (text only)

Share

Juon1

 

I don’t ask very much of a horror movie, really I don’t.  I just want it to do one thing:  scare me.

Apparently, that’s asking a lot.  Studios and movie-rental companies are well aware of the demand for horror, and there are hundreds – maybe thousands – of genre titles out there.  Some of these horror flicks have competent acting, quasi-believable storylines, decent cinematography, and capable direction.  They do not, however, ever, ever, ever contain anything that scares me.  They do have lots of gore, but blood and guts are not scary; they are merely repulsive.  Achieving a good scare on film is the equivalent of a no-hitter in baseball, something rare and memorable.

I think the last time a horror movie made me jump was in 2002, when that creepy girl in The Ring climbed out of a television set.  The Ring was an American remake of a Japanese film, and so is 2004’s The Grudge.   Japan has quite a reputation for scary movies these days, so I decided to watch Ju-on, a 2000 direct-to-video cheapo* that inspired not only The Grudge, but also a number of sequels.

It scared me.

The low-budget little thriller got me good – one time for sure, maybe twice.  Okay, twice.  There is one scene in particular, set on a staircase near the end of the film … well, I’m not going to spoil it.

I can’t in good conscience recommend much else about Ju-on.  Its plot is silly, derivative, and at times incoherent – so no kudos to the screenwriter.  The acting is pedestrian.  But the director and his crew of photographers, editors, and soundmen obviously studied their horror movies.  They know timing, framing, and lighting, and they applied them very well.  I wanted them to do but one thing, and that they did.  They scared me.  Maybe twice.      Grade:  B

 

Juon2

  

Director:  Takashi Shimizu  Cast:  Yurei Yanagi, Chiaki Kuriyama, Hitomi Miwa  Release:  2000* (This might be incorrect. At least one source says the film was released, theatrically, in 2002.)

 

Juon3                  Juon4

                                      Watch Trailer (click here)

 

© 2010-2026 grouchyeditor.com (text only)

Share

Witness

 

Sometimes you don’t really need to write a “review.”  You can simply list the talent behind a film.  Story:  Agatha Christie.  Director:  Billy Wilder.  Cast:  Charles Laughton, Marlene Dietrich, Tyrone Power, Elsa Lanchester.  Now do yourself a favor and go watch this great courtroom drama from 1957.  It’s free when you click here.

 

© 2010-2026 grouchyeditor.com (text only)

Share

 by L. Frank Baum

Wizard

 

Unlike other classic children’s books, L. Frank Baum’s Wizard seems intended to be taken at face value:  It actually appears to be written for children.  I suppose you could read into it all sorts of political commentary – on slavery, Western imperialism, etc. – but I prefer to see it much as I do the movie, just Dorothy and her three odd pals (and Toto) having wonderful adventures.

It’s interesting to learn which elements of the book that Hollywood chose to tweak. Ruby Slippers instead of Silver Shoes?  No China People?  No Hammer-Heads?  Oh, my!

 

© 2010-2026 grouchyeditor.com (text only)

Share

Cell1

 

It’s funny how one flaw in a movie can make all the difference between an enjoyable time or an exasperating experience.  Cell 211, a Spanish prison thriller, is absorbing for about 30 minutes – but then a key relationship that does not ring true spoils all the fun.

The movie has a clever premise.  A rookie prison guard has just walked into the joint when all hell breaks loose.  There is a riot, violence and, in the confusion, guard trainee Juan (Alberto Ammann) is mistaken for one of the inmates.  He becomes trapped with hundreds of vicious cons as tense negotiations begin between prison officials and the inmates’ leader, Malamadre (Luis Tosar).

And this is where the movie lost me.  Implausibly, the tough, shrewd Malamadre is so impressed by a couple of seemingly pro-inmate suggestions made by newcomer Juan that the hardened con and the stubble-faced young man quickly become Best Friends Forever.  This plot absurdity turns what might have been a tense thrill ride into a series of “yeah, right” moments.

I don’t generally read a lot of reviews before writing mine, but yesterday I noticed two local scribes with opposite takes on Cell 211.   Said Critic Number One:  “It’s a great, simple premise, and I will be surprised if we don’t get an American remake … this may be one case where a remake is justified.”  Said Critic Number Two:  “I’ll bet you $100 that Hollywood snaps up this property for a glossy, star-studded remake. I’ll bet you $1,000 that this version is better.”

I’m taking the side of Critic Number One.  For once, Hollywood has the opportunity to actually improve on a foreign film.         Grade:  C

 

Director:  Daniel Monzon  Cast:  Luis Tosar, Alberto Ammann, Antonio Resines, Manuel Moron, Carlos Bardem, Marta Etura  Release:  2009

 

Cell2        Cell3


                                            Watch Trailers  (click here)

 

© 2010-2026 grouchyeditor.com (text only)

Share