Abigail
Pros: If you are into “comfort horror,” in which you don’t expect major twists in the story nor deep psychological insight, this movie is for you. It’s got a small group of people trapped in a spooky mansion with a killer on the loose who is picking them off, one by one. That’s the (familiar) plot.
I liked that. If it worked for And Then There Were None, it’s good enough for me.
Cons: It’s not a big spoiler to reveal that the killer is a little-girl vampire who is into ballet. She is played by a young actress who makes faces and dances and wears Dracula fangs. That’s the hook.
I didn’t like that. The girl is not very scary, and the gimmick wears thin. Also, the other characters are shallow, there is little wit in the dialogue, and gore replaces suspense. This is not And Then There Were None.
But if you just want something familiar, here you go. Release: 2024 Grade: B
Would I watch it again? If I am stressed and need something silly but comforting, possibly.
*
Pearl
Here is what Pearl is: gorgeous to look at, well-acted, thought-provoking, and original.
Here is what Pearl is not: much fun.
Maybe it’s a product of our times, and Ti West’s trilogy of terror (along with X and MaXXXine) simply reflects the national mood. But I can’t help comparing X to 1974’s The Texas Chain Saw Massacre and Pearl — a psychological profile of a murderess in the making — to early ‘60s melodramas What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? and Hush … Hush, Sweet Charlotte.
West’s fondness for those earlier movies is apparent. The plots and/or themes are similar in all of them. And yet …
Chain Saw and the Bette Davis films were scary-good fun, horror with an underlying sense of humor. West’s movies are technically impressive, but bleak and unpleasant. Release: 2022 Grade: B
Would I watch it again? Not likely. See above.
© 2010-2024 grouchyeditor.com (text only)