Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince



I don’t care how old you are, 15 or 50, the beginning of the end of the Harry Potter saga is sad news.  But for me, this magical film franchise really began to fade about five years ago.

The Potter films were a marvel in the beginning.  Director Chris Columbus reached into a hat and produced a pair of movies that captured not only the essence of J.K. Rowling’s novels, but also their appearance.  Think about it.  All of the Potter films – including the five not directed by Columbus – have relied on the ingenious casting, sets, and music introduced in the first film.  Who supervised the construction of Hogwarts?  What genius cast Robbie Coltrane as Hagrid?  With all due respect, it wasn’t David Yates; nor was it Mike Newell or Alfonso Cuaron.  Rowling could not have asked for a better director than Columbus to transfer her vision to film.




Beginning with the third film, the series’s tone began to change.  Gradually, almost imperceptibly, the movies lost some of their charm.  As Harry, Ron and Hermione grew older and less innocent, the stories moved away from the wonder of magic and the mind-blowing concept of a school for wizards, and more toward standard teenage melodrama.  It’s impossible to pinpoint exactly when the fantasy began to diminish, but the transition was unmistakable.   If I were handing out Harry Potter grades in the Great Hall, they would go something like this:  First two films – A;  third and fourth films – B+;  fifth and sixth films – B.

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince is a good movie.  The franchise’s expensive production values, veteran actors, and commitment to quality ensure that all Potter films at least look and sound impressive.  It’s the tone, the ambience, that has changed – and not for the better.




Rowling’s books somehow managed to avoid this pitfall.  Maybe that’s because in the books we don’t actually hear Harry’s voice mutate from soprano to baritone (as we did in Chamber of Secrets), nor did we actually watch Ron grow so tall.  Or maybe it’s simply a testament to Rowling’s skill as a writer.




Here’s hoping that Deathly Hallows, which opens in a few days, can recapture some of that old magic … although I don’t expect that it will.   Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince:    Grade:  B-


Potter5     Potter6

Director:  David Yates  Cast:  Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Helena Bonham Carter, Jim Broadbent, Robbie Coltrane, Tom Felton, Michael Gambon, Alan Rickman, Maggie Smith  Release:  2009

 Potter7      Watch Trailers & Clips (click here)


© 2010-2023 grouchyeditor.com (text only)


1 comment

  1. Sparky November 16, 2010 9:59 pm  Reply

    Nice blog, well thought out and explained. I do respectfully disagree. I thought Columbus did an adequate job of bringing the first two books to life, but there was nothing artistic and memorable about his adaptations. To me they were just visual stories. I have begun rewatching the films, one per night until release on Friday. I just watched Prisoner of Azkaban tonight. I happen to think it is the best of the series. Yes, I agree that as the children get older there childlike innocence is lost. Unfortunately it happens to all of us, but from the perspective of film as a visual art form the films got better when Columbus left. Curan’s 3rd is my favorite. Newell’s 4th is second. I admit that Yates’ two to date don’t have the human touch that the others possess, but he did have the daunting task of adapting two of the longest and most difficult in the series. That said, I did have some problems with material left out of 6, but I am hoping some of it is including in the first part of 7.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *